The Pope, The Big Bang and the Theory of Evolution
Pope Francis has recently
declared that The Big Bang Theory and the Theory of Evolution are true, and
that God is not “a magician with a magic wand.”
Read the article here and here.
A few thoughts:
GOD, THE GREAT MAGICIAN
The Pope says that we
shouldn’t view God as “a magician with a magic wand.” This is quite silly. How would the Pope (or scientists, or anyone
else for that matter) know concretely
how God created the world? There is in fact no way of knowing for
sure. We can try our best to research
and discover, but postulating how God actually created the universe is mere
speculation. The Pope may be rejecting
one view of creation, but this doesn’t mean that God couldn’t have created the world that way. God’s power is not restricted by our limited
understanding of it.
Science is best
understood in the words of Johannes Kepler: “Science is thinking God’s thoughts
after him.” It isn’t religion vs.
science, faith vs. reason or evolution vs. the Bible; science is discovering how the world works. It’s not a time machine or a mind-reading
device that shows us the specific steps in how God brought the world into
being, nor is it a way to disprove God’s existence.
By the same token, I
understand that the Pope’s statement is also trying to eliminate the “God of
the gaps” mentality. This is where God
is used as a tool to plug in holes or “gaps” in scientific understanding. If this is what the Pope is trying to
communicate, he is certainly right in saying that we should not view God in
this way.
PONTIFEX: THE BRIDGE BUILDER
Pope Francis has been
working hard to shorten the gap between those who have place faith in Jesus and
those who have not. I think this is an
extension of it. His comments on
homosexuality also reflect this. He
hasn’t sanctioned a homosexual lifestyle, but instead is trying to bridge a gap
that the Church has classically been really bad at doing. Christians don’t hate gays. The Pope sees that this mentality exists,
however, and is trying to change that. And
for this, he should be applauded.
With his comments on
science, he isn’t revoking his faith in God, or abandoning the infallibility of
scripture, or accepting The Book of Mormon as part of the canon… In fact, he
isn’t necessarily accepting the Theory of Evolution either. He’s
saying that no matter where science points us with regards to the origin of the
universe, God is still the one who created it. One does not have to accept one specific view
of creation to become a Christian.
Christianity isn’t about how old you think the earth is; it’s about who
you think Jesus is.
HE’S NOT INFALLIBLE … JESUS IS
I don’t want to overly
defend Pope Francis, but I don’t want to attack him either. I think the "magic wand" comment wasn't necessary, but I also don't think he's trying to harm the Christian faith. As far as where to place him on the spectrum
of truth statements, I’m not Catholic, so I’m not obligated to view him as
infallible (thankfully). He’s a human,
and humans make mistakes. At the same
time, I’m sure he does understand his scale of influence, and so when he makes
comments like this in a speech, it’s for a purpose. And no one is forced to agree or disagree
with him.
Whether or not you agree
with his claims, there’s no reason to crucify the guy. He isn’t Jesus; he’s somebody who is trying
to do what he thinks is right. It’s entirely
possible to support one thing he says or does, and not be 100% behind something else he says or does. A single sentence or two doesn’t define a
person. A lifetime of deeds defines a
person. And in the case of Jesus, his
life was defined by his selfless deeds manifested in giving his life for the
world, and his resurrection from the dead.
Let’s focus more on what he has to say.
“Anyone who listens to my
teaching and follows it is wise, like a person who builds a house on solid
rock…but anyone who hears my teaching and doesn't obey it is foolish, like a
person who builds a house on sand.” –Jesus (Matthew 7:24, 26)
**UPDATE 11/1/14
I found the full, original
comment made by Pope Francis, which is more accurate than the headline I originally wrote this under. I think this more accurately shows that his view of God has not changed:
"God is not a demiurge or a
conjurer, but the Creator who gives being to all things. The beginning of the
world is not the work of chaos that owes its origin to another, but derives
directly from a supreme Origin that creates out of love. The Big Bang, which
nowadays is posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine
act of creating, but rather requires it. The evolution of nature does not
contrast with the notion of Creation, as evolution presupposes the creation of
beings that evolve."
Comments
Post a Comment